Volume 2, Issue 4 (Autumn 2021)
J Vessel Circ 2021, 2(4): 161-170 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Karimi M, Emadi S Z, Mohsen Zadeh Y, Izanloo M. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Compassion-focused Therapy and Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction in Reducing Type D Personality Traits in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease. J Vessel Circ 2021; 2 (4) :161-170
URL: http://jvessels.muq.ac.ir/article-1-74-en.html
URL: http://jvessels.muq.ac.ir/article-1-74-en.html
1- Department of General Psychology, School of Psychology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.
2- Department of Health Psychology, School of Psychology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.
3- Department of Medical Emergencies, School of Nursing, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
2- Department of Health Psychology, School of Psychology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.
3- Department of Medical Emergencies, School of Nursing, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
Abstract: (920 Views)
Background and Aim: Coronary patients with type D personality have high stress and inhibit negative emotions. Despite receiving similar medical procedures as other coronary patients they show a slower recovery process and recurrent heart attacks. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of compassion-focused therapy (CFT) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in reducing type D personality traits in patients with coronary heart disease.
Materials and Methods: The present research method was quasi-experimental with a pre-test-post-test-follow-up design with a control group. The statistical population of this study was all patients with coronary heart disease in Rajai Alborz Hospital in Karaj City, Iran, in 2019. A total of 45 people were selected by convenience sampling and randomly assigned to three groups under the title of CFT, MBSR, and control group. Subjects responded to the type D personality scale by Denollet (2005) for pre-test, post-test, and follow-up. CFT and MBSR were each held in 8 sessions of 90 minutes. In the present study, the statistical method of repeated measure analysis of variance in SPSS software, version 18, was used to analyze the data with 0.05 and 0.01 significance levels.
Results: After the intervention, the average score of type D traits symptoms of the test group (73.26 with a standard deviation of 4.49) was significantly lower than the control group (53.36 with a standard deviation of 27.4). CFT and MBSR had a reducing effect on type D personality traits over time (P<0.001). Also, a significant difference was observed between the effectiveness of CFT and MBSR in reducing type D personality traits (P=0.020).
Conclusion: CFT and MBSR are both effective in treating patients with type D personality but CFT is more effective.
Materials and Methods: The present research method was quasi-experimental with a pre-test-post-test-follow-up design with a control group. The statistical population of this study was all patients with coronary heart disease in Rajai Alborz Hospital in Karaj City, Iran, in 2019. A total of 45 people were selected by convenience sampling and randomly assigned to three groups under the title of CFT, MBSR, and control group. Subjects responded to the type D personality scale by Denollet (2005) for pre-test, post-test, and follow-up. CFT and MBSR were each held in 8 sessions of 90 minutes. In the present study, the statistical method of repeated measure analysis of variance in SPSS software, version 18, was used to analyze the data with 0.05 and 0.01 significance levels.
Results: After the intervention, the average score of type D traits symptoms of the test group (73.26 with a standard deviation of 4.49) was significantly lower than the control group (53.36 with a standard deviation of 27.4). CFT and MBSR had a reducing effect on type D personality traits over time (P<0.001). Also, a significant difference was observed between the effectiveness of CFT and MBSR in reducing type D personality traits (P=0.020).
Conclusion: CFT and MBSR are both effective in treating patients with type D personality but CFT is more effective.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
cardiovascular diseases
Received: 2021/05/21 | Accepted: 2021/07/30 | Published: 2021/12/31
Received: 2021/05/21 | Accepted: 2021/07/30 | Published: 2021/12/31
References
1. Musunuru K, Qasim AN, Reilly MP. 7 - Genetics and genomics of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In: Pyeritz RE, Korf BR, Grody WW, editors. Emery and rimoin's principles and practice of medical genetics and genomics. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2020. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-812532-8.00007-0] [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-812532-8.00007-0]
2. Müller-Nordhorn J, Willich SN. Coronary heart disease. In: Quah SR, editor. International encyclopedia of public health (Second Edition). Cambridge: Academic Press; 2017. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-803678-5.00090-4] [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-803678-5.00090-4]
3. Aluja A, Malas O, Lucas I, Worner F, Bascompte R. Assessment of the Type D personality distress in coronary heart disease patients and healthy subjects in Spain. Personality and Individual Differences. 2019; 142:301-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2018.08.011] [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2018.08.011]
4. Li X, Zhang S, Xu H, Tang X, Zhou H, Yuan J, et al. Type D personality predicts poor medication adherence in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A six-month follow-up study. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2):e0146892. [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0146892]
5. Allen MT, Handy JD, Blankenship MR, Servatius RJ. The distressed (Type D) personality factor of social inhibition, but not negative affectivity, enhances eyeblink conditioning. Behav Brain Res. 2018; 345:93-103. [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2018.02.035]
6. Kupper N, Denollet J. Type D personality as a risk factor in coronary heart disease: A review of current evidence. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018; 20(11):104. [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1007/s11886-018-1048-x]
7. Sirois FM. The association between self-compassion and self-rated health in 26 samples. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):74. [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-8183-1]
8. Gardhouse K, Segal Z. Mindfulness. In: Wright JD, editor. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Second Edition). Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2015. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.14148-0] [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.14148-0]
9. Wilson JM, Weiss A, Shook NJ. Mindfulness, self-compassion, and savoring: Factors that explain the relation between perceived social support and well-being. Pers Individ Dif. 2020; 152:109568. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109568] [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109568]
10. Azimian T. [The effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy training in improving type d personality components and increasing the sense of cohesion in patients with coronary artery disease (Persian)] [MA thesis]. Tehran: Tehran University; 2014. [Link]
11. Gu Y, Zhu Y. TCTAP A-138 effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on components of the metabolic syndrome in patients with coronary heart disease: A randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 71(16, Supplement):S38. [DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.125] [DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.125]
12. Jankowski T, Holas P. Metacognitive model of mindfulness. Conscious Cogn. 2014; 28:64-80. [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2014.06.005]
13. Morgan LPK, Danitz SB, Roemer L, Orsillo SM. Mindfulness approaches to psychological disorders. In: Friedman HS, editor. Encyclopedia of mental health (Second Edition). Cambridge: Academic Press; 2016. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-9.00264-0] [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-9.00264-0]
14. Wimmer L, Bellingrath S, von Stockhausen L. Mindfulness training for improving attention regulation in university students: Is it effective? and do yoga and homework matter? Front Psychol. 2020; 11:719. [PMID] [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00719]
15. Jalali D, Aghaei A, Talebi H, Mazaheri M. Comparing the Effectiveness of Natived Mindfulness-based Cognitive Training (MBCT) and Cognitive-Behavioral Training on Dysfunctional Attitudes and Job Affects in Employees. Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 5(1):1-20.
16. Brophy K, Brähler E, Hinz A, Schmidt S, Körner A. The role of self-compassion in the relationship between attachment, depression, and quality of life. J Affect Disord. 2020; 260:45-52. [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.066]
17. Fresnics AA, Wang SB, Borders A. The unique associations between self-compassion and eating disorder psychopathology and the mediating role of rumination. Psychiatry Res. 2019; 274:91-7. [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.02.019]
18. Lienhart C. WITHDRAWN: The relationship between mindfulness, self-compassion and body appreciation. EXPLORE. 2019. [DOI:10.1016/j.explore.2019.09.003] [DOI:10.1016/j.explore.2019.09.003]
19. Abolghasemi A, Taghipour M, Narimani M. [The relationship of type "D" personality, self-compassion and social support with health behaviors in patients with coronary heart disease (Persian)]. Q J Health Psychol. 2012; 1(1):5-19. [Link]
20. Krieger T, Altenstein D, Baettig I, Doerig N, Holtforth MG. Self-compassion in depression: Associations with depressive symptoms, rumination, and avoidance in depressed outpatients. Behav Ther. 2013; 44(3):501-13 [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2013.04.004]
21. Baqeri S, Masiri F, Masiri L, Moradi K. [The relationship between D type personality and self-compassion with health behaviors in women with breast cancer: Moderating role of perceived stress (Persian)]. J Contemp Psychol. 2019; 14(1):1-11. [DOI:10.29252/bjcp.14.1.1] [DOI:10.29252/bjcp.14.1.1]
22. Joehanes R. Transcriptome and epigenome applications for coronary heart disease research. In: Vasan RS, Sawyer DB, editors. Encyclopedia of cardiovascular research and medicine. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2018. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-809657-4.99574-7] [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-809657-4.99574-7]
23. VanVoorhis W, Morgan BL. Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2007; 3(2):43-50. [DOI:10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043] [DOI:10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043]
24. Denollet J. DS14: Standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition, and Type D personality. Psychosom Med. 2005; 67(1):89-97. [PMID] [DOI:10.1097/01.psy.0000149256.81953.49]
25. Dadashzadeh. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Type D Personality Questionnaire in heart patients. Tabriz: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences; 2013.
26. Raes F. Rumination and worry as mediators of the relationship between self-compassion and depression and anxiety. Pers Individ Dif. 2010; 48(6):757-61. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.023] [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.023]
27. Gilbert P. The Compassionate Mind: A New Approach to Life's Challenges. Oakland, California, United States: New Harbinger Publications; 2010. [Link]
28. Gilbert P. The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy. Br J Clin Psychol. 2014; 53(1):6-41. [PMID] [DOI:10.1111/bjc.12043]
29. Kamalinasab Z, Mohammadkhani P. A comparison of self-compassion and self-esteem based on their relationship with adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies. Pr Clin Psychol. 2018; 6(1):9-20. [DOI:10.29252/nirp.jpcp.6.1.9] [DOI:10.29252/nirp.jpcp.6.1.9]
30. Klimecki OM, Singer T. Compassion. In: Toga AW, editor. Brain mapping. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2015. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-397025-1.00178-0] [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-397025-1.00178-0]
31. Mikaili N, Ghasemi MA, Salari S, Sakeni Z. [Theoretical and practical dimensions of adherence to treatment in patients: A review study (Persian)]. Med J Mashhad Univ Med Sci. 2019; 62(2):1403-19. [Link]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Owned by Qom University of Medical Sciences
Published by Qom University of Medical Sciences Press
eISSN: 2717-0357
Email: jvessels[at]muq.ac.ir
j.vessels.circul[at]gmail.com
